Deconstruction or restoration?

The goal of reevaluating Christianity is authentic faith, not cynical unbelief

In describing my journey of rethinking Christianity over the past twelve years I’ve used a couple of metaphors. One I call End of the Line. I first used this metaphor when speaking to the staff of Charisma Publishing six years ago. Later I wrote an op-ed piece on this metaphor which was published in Charisma magazine in May of 2010. In that piece I introduced the metaphor like this:

I’m reminded of the times I’ve been in Paris and traveling across the city on the metro system. If I want to travel from Notre Dame to Montmartre I can’t do it on one train. At some point I have to disembark, find the correct platform and catch another train. If you’ve never done it before it can be confusing.

This may be a prophetic analogy for the confusion evangelicals feel in the first part of the 21st century. We’ve reached a terminus. We need to find another platform. We need to catch a new train. And we’re not quite sure what it is. But of this we can be quite certain: the train we have been on will not carry Christianity into the 21st century in a compelling and engaging way — no matter how enthusiastically we sing ‘give me that old time religion’ while we sit on a motionless train.

What is this train stuck at the station? I think it can be summed up as ‘Christianity characterized by protest.’ We need to face the reality that the protest train has come to the end of the line.

The other metaphor is Water To Wine — a metaphor I set forth in a memoir published earlier this year.

Finding the right platform to catch the right train to carry Christianity into the 21st century.

Watered-down consumer Christianity being transformed into the rich wine of a robust Christianity.

I like these metaphors.

Which brings me to a way of talking about rethinking Christianity that I don’t like and my suggestion of a third metaphor.

In my travels and conversations I encounter growing numbers of Christians going through what is often called “deconstruction.” These are believers in the process of paring away the extraneous elements of culture, myth, and toxic dogma from their faith. I’m sympathetic with this undertaking. This is necessary work for many (though not all) who seek to retain Christian faith in an increasingly post-Christian culture.

Rethinking Christian deconstruction

But while I’m sympathetic with the need to rethink Christian faith, I don’t like the language of deconstruction. Deconstruction is too negative, too violent, too cynical. It has a tendency to lead to the irreverence of iconoclasm.

This is the young Christian who having escaped the suffocating world of narrow fundamentalism, now just wants to burn everything down. This reaction, though understandable, is ultimately neither wise nor helpful.

The goal of reevaluating Christianity is authentic faith, not cynical unbelief. Click To Tweet

For the Christian, deconstruction is not an end in itself; deconstruction alone is not a proper goal. We can’t deconstruct forever. If all we ever do is deconstruct faith, eventually there will be nothing left — just the discarded rubble from the relentless blows of a sledgehammer. The goal of reevaluating Christianity is authentic faith, not cynical unbelief.

Let me propose a better way of talking about the process of rethinking Christian faith — a healthier metaphor. Instead of the negative metaphor of deconstruction (and deconstruction is a metaphor), I prefer the positive metaphor of art restoration.

Embracing Christian restoration

Think of an ancient icon of Christ.

Imagine, for example, that a thousand year old Christ Pantokrator painted on a wooden panel is discovered in some forgotten monastery. The image of Christ is there, but it is covered with a thick patina of grime, dirt, and soot accumulated over centuries that has obscured the image of Christ.

Now imagine that a restoration artist is given the task of returning the icon to its original vibrancy and beauty. Think about how the restoration artist goes about her work. Among her tools for restoration work we will not find explosives. You can’t restore art with dynamite!

It’s true that faith in Jesus Christ has been distorted over the centuries by layers of varnish, lacquer, dirt, and grime. The beautiful image of Christ has been obscured by the imposition of cultural assumptions, political agendas, distorted doctrines, and the corrupting influence of empire.

Fundamentalism, literalism, nationalism, and consumerism have created layers of varnish that distort the beautiful image of Christ.

But as we seek to remove these contaminants and recover the beauty of Christ, we cannot employ cynical and violent methodologies. If we do, we run the risk of destroying the priceless treasure in the process. We must be patient and reverent.

If all we want to do is deconstruct and destroy Christian faith, we can swing an angry hammer; but if want to restore Christian faith, the patience and gentleness of wisdom is required.

In our passion to rescue Christian faith from its myriad of distortions, we are not like the Taliban blowing up the Buddhas of Bamiyan, but like the artists who restored Michelangelo’s vandalized Pietá.

In rethinking Christianity we must always keep in mind that we are handling something enormously precious — faith in Christ. Faith in Christ is so precious that we are committed to the difficult task of restoring it to its original beauty.

But we cannot use cheap cynicism and crude mockery in this delicate task. We go about it patiently, reverently, gently, always showing deep respect for the Great Tradition that has sustained Christian faith and practice for two thousand years.

Rethinking the great Christian tradition

This is why I always insist that I am deeply conservative. When it comes to Christianity I am far more conservative than progressive or liberal. My way of sustaining Christianity in an age of secularism is to root it in the rich soil of the Great Tradition. An emphasis on sacrament and liturgy, creed and calendar, and a church untethered from Constantinianism is a truly conservative position.

We don’t need to deconstruct Christian faith, we need to restore Christian faith. Click To Tweet

Modern fundamentalism is not conservative, it’s just a reactive form of liberal empiricism. Fundamentalism is another guise of deconstruction. Fundamentalism is to Christianity what paint-by-numbers is to art.

We don’t need to deconstruct Christian faith, we need to restore Christian faith. We do it prayerfully. We do it patiently. We do it reverently. We do it with kid gloves and Q-tips, not with dynamite and sledgehammers. We do it with our wisest saints and sages, not with Nietzsche and Derrida.

My journey of rediscovering the beauty of Christ was mostly a journey I traveled in prayer. It’s true that I read a ton of good theology, but this only changed my mind. My heart was changed as I learned to sit with Jesus in contemplative prayer.

Don’t deconstruct…pray. Sit with Jesus. Gaze upon his beauty. See the beautiful image of Christ lying under the patina of distortion. Keep your eyes on Jesus. Then wipe away the false varnish with your tears of gratitude. This is restoration, not deconstruction. This is what will save your faith.

Dear Readers:

ChristianWeek relies on your generous support. please take a minute and donate to help give voice to stories that inform, encourage and inspire.

Donations of $20 or more will receive a charitable receipt.
Thank you, from Christianweek.

About the author

and

Brian Zahnd is the founder and lead pastor of Word of Life Church, a non-denominational Christian congregation in Saint Joseph, Missouri. Brian and his wife, Peri, founded the church in 1981. Brian is also the author of several books, including, A Farewell To Mars, Beauty Will Save the World, Unconditional?: The Call of Jesus to Radical Forgiveness, Water to Wine and his latest, Sinners in the Hands of a Loving God. He also blogs at brianzahnd.com

About the author

and